My wife purchased one for me as an anniversary present in January 2019. We were told that fewer than 100 were ever produced and that the one we received was the last of them. Further inquiries have led to consistent answers of "less than 100" and the explanation that it was too expensive to produce.
I have the same two as my only true dress watches. I consider both elegant and understated. I prefer the automatic movement and central seconds hand of the 5107P, but do wish it were 38 or 39 mm. I've considered adding the 5227G, but since these two are so seldom worn, I fear a 3rd variation on the
Does it suggest these were intended for export? Is there reason to believe these are actually associated with the Chinese space program, or is it merely a marketing ploy? Park
Tim, Actually, the dial is the mineral turquoise. I bought one for my wife, which she loves, and after a major hunt, got her the pink one with pink mother-of-pearl dial. We've been waiting for months for replacement straps. These are not easy to find complete with matching box, matching wallet, and
Here's a source that does provide rates per million population: www.worldometers.info #countries Those rates are far more meaningful than frequency data (raw numbers), but keep in mind that nations and their subdivisions are using varying tests and criteria for positivity and for death causa
I like them, too, as they've used lots of my favorite design cues. They seem to have done a fine job of mixing and matching. It's just that innovation requires more. Park
I'd find it derivative if a watch brand were to adopt the entirely plagiarized slogan: "To break the rules you must first master them so as to create one of not many and provide a crown for every achievement." Credits: Audemars Piguet, Vacheron Constantin, Rolex. I don't disagree about the Alpine Ea