murcielagoboy
33
I have mixed feelings....
Aug 02, 2016,10:40 AM
Baron,
Thank you for your sharing your positive and optimistic story with us. I do believe however, that there are two ways of viewing your story.
- the first is that, it was unacceptable for a watch to be returned to you with such a flaw which would manifest itself within just a single day of wearing and that Pateks subsequent actions are not optional but 'necessary' to redeem themselves after such a QC oversight.
- the second is that "these things happen" and that they have gone out of their way to satisfy their customer by way of waiving the cost of the original service too which is "in excess" of their obligations and more than could be reasonably expected.
I believe that the middle ground between these two negative and optimistic scenarios is where we should place our expectations as reasonable customers, in other words - "it shouldn't have come defective but they've more than made up for it" - and the result is your satisfaction and happiness, which is what we have here.
IF (and this is a big IF) Patek deliver this kind of value to ALL customers, and maintain production at levels where product design, finish, QC and service is in line with the past products, and the pieces retain value and exclusivity, then the brand will continue to prosper for many decades into the future and purchasers will happily invest in the brand at ever higher levels without batting an eyelid....
I've heard that PP is now cutting production and the new facilities will be dedicated to service. Bravo.
Over to you Mr T. Stern to see how this pans out.