Why were the photos deleted??

Feb 23, 2010,19:41 PM
 


  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Has anyone seen the new 5396 in metal cp.to 5125 yet?

 
 By: lutz : February 23rd, 2010-14:28
Hello all, there were several posts here about the new 5396 design,but no real "in metal" impressions yet,but only pictures from official sites or catalogues AFAIK. I also read posts here which compared those "almost twins"-5125 in REAL life pictures to p... 

Why were the photos deleted??

 
 By: patektime1 : February 23rd, 2010-19:41

Deleted posts and or pics...

 
 By: DRMW : February 23rd, 2010-19:51
Any violations of our Terms Of Service Guidelines (such as shilling by dealers or grey marketers) are immediately deleted and subject to posting privileges being revoked. Hope this helps. -MW

Pics and remarks

 
 By: Zeitgeist : February 23rd, 2010-23:13
Here are some pics that I found on the net. Please delete if it violates any regulations! Awesome watch but I don't like the 24h indicator (useless imho) and that "Geneve" is separated from "Patek Philippe" and squeezed into the small space between the da...  

Nice photos......

 
 By: Topcat30093 : February 24th, 2010-01:09
Would like to see some of them in W/G.

WG I have only a catalog pic

 
 By: Zeitgeist : February 24th, 2010-01:38
...  

thanks for the pic update,comments:

 
 By: lutz : February 24th, 2010-02:39
thanks definitely great looking,esp.the last pic.,for me a probable PP icon if production numbers remain small. Funny, the repeated critical remarks about the 24 hour marks.The 5125 had them too,and 3448etc had a seconds-scale there looking just the same.... 

I think I prefer the original 5396R

 
 By: Mike Wood : February 27th, 2010-08:44
I'm going to stick with mine! MW...  

I like the New Rose Gold version

 
 By: gqmagic : February 27th, 2010-13:48
better than the old one with the blue hands and tracks, though I liked in pictures the White Gold with blue tracks and hands. Geneva under the day/month is better than in the half circle layout of the sector dial.

Saw the actual watch...

 
 By: fernando : February 24th, 2010-03:08
a few days ago at an AD.They only had the WG and I was very very tempted to walk out with it.However, I have been wanting a RG watch for a while and thus will wait a lttle longer. It's everything I thought it would be and more! cheers fernando

question

 
 By: Zeitgeist : February 24th, 2010-03:45
fernando, how did you feel about the word Geneve squeezed into the center? And the dominant large letters of Patek Philippe? Is it disturbing when looking at the actual piece? Thx!

No problems...

 
 By: fernando : February 24th, 2010-03:52
in my eyes.It was legible and felt perfect on my wrist. For a daily wear Patek, this one is hard to beat.

re:5396RG

 
 By: rb8888888 : February 24th, 2010-09:56
I did see and handle the Rose gold 5396. I am not a fan of rose gold but this watch is beautiful. Clean, well proportioned, and just one great looking watch.

Ready down here Fernando

 
 By: Quan : February 24th, 2010-19:58
the RG, play with it yesterday but this new dial make the watch seem bigger and the dial color not as nice as the old one, being a minority here I like the old one - it looks much better

here the pix

 
 By: Quan : February 25th, 2010-01:46
...  

great thanks,

 
 By: lutz : February 25th, 2010-02:37
looking forward to handle it. kind regards, Lutz

5396R

 
 By: cmclee : February 25th, 2010-06:01
Hi Quan, thanks for the pic. Could you also post a pic of the old 5396r for comparison ? Just wondering which one appeals to me more. Thanks Dude !

Hope this lousy pix help

 
 By: Quan : February 26th, 2010-03:28
g...  

I saw it in person, and came away with the same opinion.

 
 By: boa2 : February 25th, 2010-07:00
Upon first seeing photos of the new model, my first thought was that it had effectively "resolved" the old one. However, with the sector dial 5396r sitting next to it, I was surprised to discover that I preferred it to the new one.

possible reason:

 
 By: lutz : February 27th, 2010-11:03
While having seen the old dial many times at dealers,the new one just from the pics here,I still think why You might like the old one better sitting next to the new one:the old one is dual coloured and much more to "see" on the dial-for me much too much g... 

agree with Quan, I saw and handed it,

 
 By: Mech : February 26th, 2010-00:36
it looked really nice from the internet pix, but in the flesh, the dial looks 'bare' thus making it look 'big' and slightly out of proportion. I prefer the sector dial version. Mech.

I would prefer rounded bazel vs sharp-edge..

 
 By: chronos-lorien : February 25th, 2010-03:46
IMO, almost all historical complications had rounded bazels. The 5396 has a sharp-edge bazel I don't like. Also, 24h indicator is useless - the 5125 had moonphase day indicator which is much more appealling for me. I also better like date window with gold... 

I don't like.....

 
 By: Dave in Wales : February 25th, 2010-23:39
Yes I know, sacriledge not to like a PP. But IMHO the balance of the dial is all wrong. Everything is in a straigt line straight down the middle, there is nothing off to the sides. Patek Philippe Day Date Geneve Hub 24 Hour Dial Moon Phase Date Window It ... 

interesting point,

 
 By: lutz : February 26th, 2010-01:41
Hi Dave, I wonder how it feels,when I see it in person,as beautiful pics can deceive,that's true. It reminds me of the impression of many Pateks,they often look a bit pale and too austere in comparison to more decorated dials of other brands which have mu... 

The Totem Pole

 
 By: Expat : February 26th, 2010-03:59
Yes indeed, looks like one: The new 5396 will live on with this nick name... This message has been edited by Expat on 2010-02-26 04:02:39

Agree and more

 
 By: Zeitgeist : February 26th, 2010-05:57
I agree with Dave. And it's not about simplicity as he owns the 5127R if I recall correctly. The dial would look more balanced if the day/month windows were shifted to the sides and a little downwards. That way there would've been also enough space to pri... 

I agree with Dave

 
 By: Mostel : February 27th, 2010-08:18
the way everything is crammed down the center stops your eye and makes your eye retrace the cluttered straight-down information, and then your mind says, 'is that 'cluttered'? The 5125 has an open breathing feeling. and I like it much better. BUT. I alway... 

a little perplexed....

 
 By: lutz : February 27th, 2010-08:45
Thanks to the numerous replies to my question,very interesting views. As far as I saw in the pictures, I was really impressed,one of the most beautiful PPs I know. On the other hand,when I first saw the 5125 2003 in picturesI immediately disliked the case... 

I love the old 5396R

 
 By: tourbillon001 : February 27th, 2010-14:57
It was my favorite affordable PP and I bought one while I was attending basel two years ago. I eventually got bored with it and sold it. When I saw the new 5396 I loved it to but in a totally different way. the sector dial was very casual and this new dia... 

One thing is very noticeable to me

 
 By: sam3 : March 1st, 2010-12:38
Did you see the difference between the watch in Quan's post--held in hand, as opposed to the other photos, by itself. In Quan's it is vastly warmer looking, shimmering and even more appealing to the eye. That's the great visual benefit to a piece like thi... 

great,tell us when it arrives! and perhaps wristshots

 
 By: lutz : March 1st, 2010-14:09
Yes Sam, I absolutely agree with You,for me too it seems to be an extremely classic ,timeless Patek,PP at its best for sure.Some critical points here are well taken,but e.g.for me -with eyes not so sharp any more as 20 years ago-,the date window at 6 is p... 

for me, the nice thing is....

 
 By: sam3 : March 1st, 2010-19:09
that this watch need not be compared to more sophisticated watches or lesser ones to be purchased and enjoyed. On it's own merits it is a keeper , very much so. The first in a long time that has gotten my attention for what is is within its category alone...