optionc
467
personally
Sep 27, 2014,20:47 PM
My wrist size may be borderline but I noticed a material difference between the 11 and the 30 (i owned this watch in titanium). My take is that is a nice size bigger than the 10 but thinner than the 11. Still it's a large watch so I agree with conkers that depending on your wrist and how you wear them it might not be too different.
As to the watch itself. The detachable clutch is a modest complication and one that engage only a handful of times for me. I'm clearly not active enough. But I bought it be.cause it was cooler than the 10 and the 11 was too big for me. Note tho I sold it about 6 months into ownership so it wasn't a keeper for me.
OpC
Comments:
view entire thread
Thoughts on RM 030
By: gglick : September 14th, 2014-13:51
Have a RM 035 and just love it. Thinking of getting and RM 030 (011 a bit too big for my taste). Any experiences with this model from current owners? Thanks, Gary
Size......
By: Conkers : September 15th, 2014-07:33
.......although the 30 is a couple of millimetres thinner the height and width are the same as the 11; is it the depth that is bothering you? I don't think with wearing that you will notice the difference much.
personally
By: optionc : September 27th, 2014-20:47
My wrist size may be borderline but I noticed a material difference between the 11 and the 30 (i owned this watch in titanium). My take is that is a nice size bigger than the 10 but thinner than the 11. Still it's a large watch so I agree with conkers tha...