I'm with Hoi on this one...
By: gatorcpa : February 15th, 2012-09:46
...the dial looks like it should for a Ref. 2852, not a Ref. 2887. However, I've never seen a Ref. 2887 without a revision number "-1 , -2", etc. So that could be a legitimate variation. Not that there are a lot of Ref. 2887's out there to compare. Since ...