Angle finishing

Feb 27, 2013,16:27 PM
 

Some more to share.

In addition:
- It's much more difficult to finish (angle part) the bridges on 240 because they are very thin and (relatively) big. The improper (or say over) angling could cause shape change of the bridges.
- Lange's German silver based movements are easier to finish to a higher level. For two reasons: bridges much thicker, the nature of German silver.
- I respect the earlier Lange "one movement one watch" way, but it could only be possible in the past. Lange didn't have a big collection. Lange didn't produce many watches. Lange didn't have (or didn't expect) an increasing large amount of service watches that will come in the years to go. The current Lange practice, change the bridge size to enlarge the existing movement, causes the disproportion of bridges layout. For these movements (e.g. the one for enlarged 1815, new Saxonia, Lange 1, etc.), I'd better have the original smaller ones.


More posts: Lange 1Saxonia

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

PP Caliber 240 – a thin base movement … (Good or bad?)

 
 By: small-luxury-world : February 26th, 2013-13:50
 born in 1977 (!) and still one of the center pieces/workhorses in the current collection. Good or bad? Some thoughts : - Reliability? Proofed. - Beautiful in the (classical) quality of workmanship and finish? Proofed. - A good base for adding complicati...  
login to reply

I have no problem with the Cal 240 or the latest version, the 260.

 
 By: amanico : February 26th, 2013-14:04
It is what I consider to be a great movement. Now, what I am not pleased with is to see the same movement ( or almost ) on a simple Calatrava AND in a watch like the Celestial. Ir is not a question of size, well, not mainly, it is just the perception I ha... 
login to reply

Why am I not surprised ...

 
 By: small-luxury-world : February 26th, 2013-14:11
to get that specific reply from you my friend? We all read about it before :-) Celestial - what in specific are you missing in that case or does it just have to be the latest and fanciest kid on the block? Oliver
login to reply

It is rather simple.

 
 By: amanico : February 26th, 2013-14:19
Why I didn't get, and won't get a Langematik Pepetual? Because it houses the same Cal than the Langematik Anniversary, with a module. Why won't I get a patek QP? For the same reason: I already own a 5110P, so the same Cal 240 with a different module. Why ... 
login to reply

I beg to differ Nico...

 
 By: dreamer8 : February 26th, 2013-19:35
I have no problem with a 240 based QP, but would have a problem if the module is a chronograph module ( goes against past PP chronograph philosophy ). To the best of my knowledge, the 240 was designed with complications in mind. I also prefer the pusher f... 
login to reply

Sorry for not having been clear enough...

 
 By: amanico : February 26th, 2013-22:51
I have no problem with the Cal 240 as a base for a QP. I agree that it is a fine offer from Patek. BUT I can't have two Patek watches sharing the same calibre, the noly difference being the module. ( WT, and QP ). I already have the WT, so I can't, due to... 
login to reply

Rules rules rules.... I thought they were made to be broken?!

 
 By: Fricks : February 27th, 2013-03:25
... Especially the ones you put to yourself. You are auto limiting yourself under the flag that you are a disciplined good boy. You should know better than anyone, the hell with all that Nicolas, or you go bold and as far as your desires will take you, or... 
login to reply

I would not blame anyone for breaking the rules...

 
 By: amanico : February 27th, 2013-08:11
I would not have any clients, hence no funds for my watch projects. ;) I have on problem to own several Rolex using the same calibre ( or almost ). I make a big difference between Rolex and Patek, though. In terms of complications, finishings, most of all... 
login to reply

Nicolas i'm going to have to unleash my lawyer...

 
 By: Fricks : February 27th, 2013-11:33
... on you for keep on beating that dead horse :)) We agree, the celestial have something hard to swallow
login to reply

hahahaha.... Actually horse meat is one of the best!

 
 By: Fricks : February 27th, 2013-11:54
no fat, full of iron, i wonder why all the fuse they did about it in France.
login to reply

As I disagree to some extent, I may explain

 
 By: Dje : February 27th, 2013-01:32
Hi Nicolas, You know that I disagree with you on that point, but not totally. No it is not the Swiss tradition to have a specific calibre for each watch. It is purely a Lange thing AFAIK and it makes sense on a marketing side, but not on a technical or in... 
login to reply

Interesting...

 
 By: Fricks : February 27th, 2013-03:38
... the celestial is crossing borders. I'm starting to like it more and more with this conversation :) You got a very good point.
login to reply

Goo'day to you Dje. I read with great interest anything you write...

 
 By: Sandgroper : February 27th, 2013-05:34
with regard to this great watch manufactory house, Patek Philippe. However, in your reply today I find two important points missing. Firstly, you mention correctly that AP and VC have, or still use a JLC base caliber but somehow forget to mention that Pat... 
login to reply

I'm not writing about calibre 920, 1120, 2120

 
 By: Dje : February 27th, 2013-08:53
Hi, The calibre I mention is the one based on the JLC 889/899, a calibre that was never used by Patek Philippe. Regarding calibre 920, it was never used in a JLC watch, so no possible comparison. best Dje
login to reply

And by the way...

 
 By: Dje : February 27th, 2013-09:11
Hi, Yes I've had in the last 20 years many calibres 1120 and 2120 in hand, be they in AP RO Jumbo, RO perpetual skeleton, Jules Audemars simple watch or EOT PC, or older watches, or in many VCs like Saltarello, Mercator, Audubon, perpetual calendars, espe... 
login to reply

Ok then Dje, then you agree that part of your statement was....

 
 By: Sandgroper : February 28th, 2013-02:21
Incorrect! We leave it a that. Cheers. Francois
login to reply

I see we make a similar statement

 
 By: Mark in Paris : February 27th, 2013-06:13
Hi Dje, We seem to have both noticed the anling finishing and the 240 presence on a wide price scale potential issues. Even if I compeltly understand your point of view, may I just mention that when you write having many calibers for nearly each watch and... 
login to reply

I hear you, Jerome.

 
 By: amanico : February 27th, 2013-08:21
Even Lange doesn't develop one movement per watch, if you take the example of the Langematik movement, which you find in the simple " Langematik " as well as in the Wempe LE ( Power Reserve indicator ) and in the Langematik Perpetual ( QP module ). But I ... 
login to reply

Yes and no

 
 By: Dje : February 27th, 2013-09:05
Hi Nicolas, sorry for your tea! The reference 5100 had a specific calibre, but was limited at 3000 pieces if I remember well, so not a small series. That was probably enough to develop and justify a specific calibre (that was eventually possibly partially... 
login to reply

I think you need to try it?

 
 By: Mean Solar Time : March 4th, 2013-20:59
As I said before: I hear your argument, but I don't agree. The difference between the most complicated Patek Automatic Minute Repeater and the least expensive Minute Repeater is MANY hundreds of thousands of dollars. The fact that they both employ the sam...  
login to reply

I trust you.

 
 By: dr.kol : March 5th, 2013-07:29
However, I have one problem with the watch: I do not have it! Best, Kari
login to reply

I have a love affair with 240

 
 By: dr.kol : February 26th, 2013-14:21
and mostly it is because of three reasons: - the movement is so incredibly slim taking into account that it's an automatic movement - being an automatic is handy but thanks to the micro rotor, the movement looks nearly as interesting as a manual one - rel... 
login to reply

240 Caliber started my love for Patek Philippe

 
 By: patrick_y : February 26th, 2013-14:55
The thin 240 caliber with its micro-rotor started my love for Patek Philippe over a decade ago. 1. It was the first micro-rotored movement from a large Swiss watch company that I noticed (Piaget actually came up with the very first micro-rotored watch mov... 
login to reply

Universal Geneve was using the first micro rotor...

 
 By: COUNT DE MONET : February 27th, 2013-05:23
... if I am not wrong. Best Moritz
login to reply

No, it was Büren in 1954 ...

 
 By: small-luxury-world : February 27th, 2013-07:07
11 month before Universal :-)
login to reply

Learned something new!

 
 By: COUNT DE MONET : February 27th, 2013-10:28
Just found the right source and read the article about "micro rotors". Many thanks for that Oliver! These are the tidbits a watch fan is craving for. Best Moritz
login to reply

Thanks! Didn't know that!

 
 By: patrick_y : February 27th, 2013-11:58
How far is Piaget down the list? 3rd?
login to reply

Yes ...

 
 By: small-luxury-world : February 27th, 2013-12:04
they have been number 3 and they paid license fees to Büren.
login to reply

I usually enjoy debating with Nicolas...

 
 By: Fricks : February 26th, 2013-15:07
... but on that specific point, i almost agree with him...! About the celestial, its such a majestic and fantastic piece, so highly priced, AND with big case for a Patek... 43mm ( not 42mm as mentioned in the post ) that i really don't understand why pate... 
login to reply

Realism and Economics are the opposite words of Luxury and Excellence.

 
 By: amanico : February 26th, 2013-23:05
Am I romantic too much? ;) Thanks for the correction on the diameter of the Celestial ( 43 mm ) , you are absolutely right. Best, Nicolas.
login to reply

Now all that being said... You've woke up my urge to get the celestial :)

 
 By: Fricks : February 27th, 2013-03:20
The hell with the 200k euro, in the end, its just money... Ain't i too Romantic as well?
login to reply

I really like that. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : February 27th, 2013-11:27
login to reply

cal 240

 
 By: Grisar : February 26th, 2013-15:26
I like 240 for the following reasons: 240 is so far, based on my personal experience, the most reliable Patek's automatic movement (among 315, 330, 324, 240). Winding efficiency is very good. (even many claim that 240 is due to the size of rotor inefficie... 
login to reply

I think it's fine

 
 By: Albert.J : February 26th, 2013-16:26
That's not the only concern about Caliber 240. There are even more widely used movements such as IWC Caliber 5000, or GO , and etc. but they are all considered very fine movements. Especially Zenith El Primero, which consists almost 70 percent of whole co... 
login to reply

Good.

 
 By: TdotBean : February 26th, 2013-17:43
It's my 1st Patek so sentimental value wise is already a winner. Wasn't aware of the cal. 260. I would love to know more about it. Regard Tyler ...  
login to reply

Same here. This was my first Patek.

 
 By: amanico : February 26th, 2013-23:21
And it is quite logical, as the World Time was the watch from Patek I desired the most! Best, Nicolas
login to reply

240 is a fine movement, but

 
 By: tahoeblue : February 26th, 2013-23:41
it is rather disappointing to see it across the board in so many watches. While each watch with the 240 has its own merits, it becomes a bit boring. New watch should equal new movement in an ideal world, though this is a more difficult economic reality. (... 
login to reply

"disappointing" or just ...

 
 By: small-luxury-world : February 27th, 2013-07:24
traditional Swiss? Mr. Stern (sen.) said in an interview some years ago: "The best proof of the excellent suitability of Caliber 240 is the fact that we haven’t needed to make any fundamental changes in it since its launch." "New watch should equal new mo... 
login to reply

No problem with size, but with finishing and overuse ...

 
 By: Mark in Paris : February 27th, 2013-02:38
Hi Oliver, As you know I've had my 5712 for nearly a year now. I payed attention to this size issue when buying mine and I still do when I look at a watch in a store. Indeed it is something I regret when it is too small : the work concerning decoration is...  
login to reply

Very nice and interesting picture Mark. There is a lot of.....

 
 By: Sandgroper : February 27th, 2013-03:08
food for thought in this thread. I'll eat first to give energy to my thoughts. Cheers. Francois
login to reply

Bon appétit !

 
 By: Mark in Paris : February 27th, 2013-05:58
And I'll read your thoughts with great interest François :) Cheers, Mark
login to reply

Mark, if i may, you are being too severe here...

 
 By: Fricks : February 27th, 2013-04:05
... about the finishing of the bridges, and the vertical edges. The parts of the movement are laser cut, and man's hand intervene later to finish those parts. Now you will not find on your nautilus the level of finishing that you will on a 5950A let's say... 
login to reply

5950A let's say! Just like that Fricks, let's say??.....

 
 By: Sandgroper : February 27th, 2013-05:48
A 5950A he says, just like that? .....are we becoming blase Fricks? If you are just let me know, I look after it very gooooood, with love and tender attention, I promise! :):):): Cheers. Francois
login to reply

I needed to make a firm point :)

 
 By: Fricks : February 27th, 2013-05:50
hard to argue against that, right?
login to reply

Very, very hard to argue against THAT indeed Fricks.:):):) [nt]

 
 By: Sandgroper : February 28th, 2013-02:16
login to reply

I agree Fricks,

 
 By: Mark in Paris : February 27th, 2013-05:56
I love that watch too and as Oliver's post concerned the 240 caliber I was only focusing the movement. But as you said, the bracelet, the case and, last but not least, the dial are absolutely great. That's why I bought this fantastic watch, and I love it,... 
login to reply

"the level of finishing that you will on a 5950A"

 
 By: small-luxury-world : February 27th, 2013-08:27
If there would be any Nautilus with that kind of finishing and attention to the detail, the price would be ridiculous. The movement inside the 5950 and lots of other details on that specific watch shown, are to die for and I could get lost just looking at... 
login to reply

do you have any good pics of that movement? [nt]

 
 By: Fricks : February 27th, 2013-12:31
login to reply

Unfortunately not ...

 
 By: small-luxury-world : February 27th, 2013-12:35
as I was not allowed to take pictures when I saw it the last time. But it still "burns" in my head and not only the movement ... Have to work on that, at least on the pictures :-) Oliver
login to reply

good to be precise...

 
 By: Fricks : February 27th, 2013-12:46
... work on the pics :) I will try to find someone who is around geneva, still the best place to have a chance to find such piece is in their salons there
login to reply

A good place to see one ...

 
 By: small-luxury-world : February 27th, 2013-12:52
but not for taking pictures :-(
login to reply

"the finishing quality of the bridges' polished angles"

 
 By: small-luxury-world : February 27th, 2013-07:53
Mark I agree with you in general, even when it is still above industry standard. People like you and me expect 100% or even more ... :-) But if we would always get what we ask for we couldn´t afford them anymore - probably :-) Once I had the idea to go fo... 
login to reply

You spot it right

 
 By: Mark in Paris : March 2nd, 2013-10:23
As you said Oliver maybe I forget what I'm waiting for compared to the production capacity and the overall demand of these watches. I was a bit unfair there. I took back the 5712 from the safe since friday and I must say this is way above the average fini... 
login to reply

angle finish

 
 By: Grisar : February 27th, 2013-16:26
Dear Mark, I am fully with you on the fact that most Patek movements can be improved in terms of angle finish. I compared 240, 315, 324, 28-20 (5100 mvmt), 27-70 (Lemania based chrono), CH 29-535 (5170), R TO 27 (3939) and R 27 (5078). In general, my find... 
login to reply

Angle finishing

 
 By: Grisar : February 27th, 2013-16:27
Some more to share. In addition: - It's much more difficult to finish (angle part) the bridges on 240 because they are very thin and (relatively) big. The improper (or say over) angling could cause shape change of the bridges. - Lange's German silver base... 
login to reply

Very interesting input

 
 By: Mark in Paris : February 28th, 2013-01:06
Hi Grisar, Thank you very much for your 2 replies, it's the kind of tangible elements I like as we need to remain objective and fair. Dje also mentioned those 3 levels of finishing and I'm glad to see that you confirm this observation. I found very intere... 
login to reply

I'm of two minds

 
 By: ZJ : February 28th, 2013-08:19
I do agree that it would be preferable to have a movement purpose-built for each reference, no modules, etc. But then you have the 5970 and its kin having the same movement as a cheap Omega... Doesn't make them less desirable in my view. I confess I am in... 
login to reply

It is very, very good for 2 years ... than not bad ... and than: loving it is the reason

 
 By: COUNT DE MONET : February 27th, 2013-05:34
Fom my experiences: fresh from the service it keeps + 1,5 sec a day time, which is amazing like a grande comp for an ultra thin movement with a beat ratio of 21.600 only and a small balance! If you waer it daily for 2 years it starts to gain more and more... 
login to reply

What a post! And the responses cross all borders, just

 
 By: whit : February 27th, 2013-08:36
like the Celestial. I view these things differently than most. The advent of sapphire backs has opened the door for a lot of discussion along with criticism with respect to finish, size of movements being used and modular additions. I have owned a 3861 fo... 
login to reply

What a superb thread.........

 
 By: Topcat30093 : March 4th, 2013-13:26
With excellent pros & cons. I have enjoyed the crossing of swords., but without any lost of blood. Personally, I am not qualified enough to make a recommendation one way or the other. But suffice to say that the 240 is an excellent and extremely relia... 
login to reply