christianch
3673
not as meaningless as your comments
Mar 24, 2015,17:00 PM
As you certainly know you don't need to reply if you don't feel that what I write is meaningful. You also don't need to inject your pearls of wisdom every time I post my views about a watch.
Indeed you are being a rude. Your vague "horology" label doesn't apply in this case. You know what the movement is but this post is not about advances in horology for an already existing movement but about the new pilot watch.
What makes it special ? Why I like it ? etc. which is indeed subjective. If you want to read objective technical opinions about a movement well.. this is not the right topic for sure.
What should I write on "how" and "what" ? This is about Basel and my impressions on the new patek. It is my post so I think that I am free to express my feelings.
If I think that the watch is cool, avant-garde and elegant I can say so. If you don't like how about you skip or you just ignore my posts altogether and focus on someone else?
I don't care about your definition of Patek "purist". I own three pateks so I can still say what I feel about a watch without your lectures.
How did I pass factual data by saying that the watch is "cool" and that to me is modern and I like it ? I can't find an explanation for this other than your deliberate intention to follow what I post and jump-in at every occasion with a dose of nonsense arguments.
All your comments and very negative and annoying. Please stop wasting my time and distracting everyone with your negativity about pretty much any brand, watch etc. unless is in steel and the way you like it. So please drop it and move on. I am sure that you can initiate much more useful conversations about horology with real purists. Leave these liking the subjective beauty of a watch alone.